CAPITAL MARKETS TRIBUNAL — FILE 2025-18 ●RESPONDENTS: PURPOSE INVESTMENTS INC. · SOM SEIF ●MERITS HEARING: COMPLETED ●CLOSING ARGUMENTS: 25 SEPTEMBER 2026 ●DECISION: RESERVED / PENDING ●OSC ALLEGATIONS: DISPUTED ●FINAL FINDING OF LIABILITY: NONE YET ●CAPITAL MARKETS TRIBUNAL — FILE 2025-18 ●RESPONDENTS: PURPOSE INVESTMENTS INC. · SOM SEIF ●MERITS HEARING: COMPLETED ●CLOSING ARGUMENTS: 25 SEPTEMBER 2026 ●DECISION: RESERVED / PENDING ●OSC ALLEGATIONS: DISPUTED ●FINAL FINDING OF LIABILITY: NONE YET ●
Capital Markets Tribunal Case — Live Status
Tribunal case
Capital Markets Tribunal — File 2025-18
Respondents
Purpose Investments Inc. · Som Seif
Merits hearing
Completed
Final closing arguments
25 September 2026
Tribunal decision
Reserved / Pending
OSC allegations
Disputed
Final finding of liability
None yet
Last verified
5 October 2026
Independent Investigative Publication

Purpose Investments and the OSC: The ESG Claims, the Evidence and the Case Awaiting Judgment

The Ontario Securities Commission alleges that Purpose Investments and founder Som Seif made 19 false or misleading sales communications about how extensively ESG factors were incorporated into the firm's investment process. Purpose and Seif deny the allegations. After a lengthy merits hearing, the Capital Markets Tribunal reserved its decision on September 25, 2026.

Tribunal Status
VERDICT?
NOT YET.

The Capital Markets Tribunal reserved its decision after closing arguments concluded September 25, 2026. No merits finding has been issued.

Track the decision
Important

The allegations described on this website have not yet been determined by the Capital Markets Tribunal. Purpose Investments and Som Seif deny wrongdoing and vigorously contested the OSC's case. Until the Tribunal issues its decision, all disputed allegations must be described as allegations.

The Case in Numbers

75% vs <35%

The ESG integration number at the centre of the OSC case

Purpose Position (as alleged by OSC)
~75%

Funds the OSC says Purpose represented as operating within its ESG framework in 2019.

vs
OSC Position
~29–35%

The figure the OSC's analysis of the relevant funds supports.

These figures represent opposing positions in an unresolved regulatory proceeding. The Tribunal has not ruled on which is correct.

Read the full number dispute

Purpose Denies the OSC Allegations

Purpose says it genuinely sought to integrate ESG considerations, disputes the OSC's interpretation of its statements, and notes the OSC has not alleged investor losses or complaints arising from the ESG claims. Seif denies the allegations and refused to settle on terms he believed would misrepresent the firm's conduct.

Read Purpose's Defence
19

Public Communications at the Centre of the Case

The OSC's application identifies 19 sales communications it alleges were false or misleading in respect of ESG integration. Each is presented with the OSC allegation, Purpose's response, and Seif's alleged involvement.

Explore All 19

Procedural Timeline

Full timeline →
  1. September 2025
    OSC enforcement application filed
  2. 12 September 2025
    Capital Markets Tribunal Notice of Hearing
  3. October 2025
    First case management hearing
  4. November 2025
    Amended application
  5. 27 February 2026
    Seif disclosure motion decided
  6. 10 April 2026
    Recusal motion
  7. 24 April 2026
    Scheduling order
  8. May 2026
    Merits evidence begins

19 statements. Two competing stories. One tribunal decision still to come.

Read the evidence · Read the defence · Wait for the finding